Browse

Latest Headlines

Fresh headlines, crisp visuals — faster reading.

Granit Xhaka's Bold Response: What's Really Happening Behind the Scenes? New

Granit Xhaka's Bold Response: What's Really Happening Behind the Scenes?

17:41 | 19 Qershor 2026 Kapiteni i Zvicrës, Granit Xhaka, ka thyer heshtjen pas raportimeve të fundit në mediat zviceriane, të cilat e përshkruanin atë si një figurë problematike brenda kombëtares.Në një artikull të publikuar ditë më parë, një burim anonim kishte pretenduar se karakteri dhe ndikimi i mesfushorit 33-vjeçar kishin krijuar një atmosferë jo të shëndetshme në grup, duke e cilësuar praninë e tij si “toksike” për ekipin.Xhaka iu përgjigj këtyre akuzave pas paraqitjes së shkëlqyer në fitoren 4:2 të Zvicrës ndaj Bosnje dhe Hercegovinës, ku kontribuoi edhe me një gol.Në një intervistë për mediat zviceriane, ai theksoi se pretendimet ndaj tij janë të pabazuara dhe se raportimet e tilla e kanë prekur personalisht.“Do të gënjeja nëse do të thosha se ajo që kam lexuar nuk më ka lënduar. Megjithatë, ajo që është shkruar nuk ka asnjë rëndësi për mua. Besoj se para se të publikohen akuza të tilla, faktet duhet të verifikohen”, deklaroi Xhaka.Mesfushori me 148 paraqitje për përfaqësuesen zvicerane theksoi gjithashtu se nuk i shmanget asnjëherë debatit apo ballafaqimit të drejtpërdrejtë.“Nëse dikush e ka të vështirë të pranojë kritikat e mia, atëherë ndoshta problemi qëndron diku tjetër. Unë jam gjithmonë i hapur për bisedë. Nëse dikush ka një problem me mua, le të vijë dhe të ma thotë në sy. Nuk kam kafshuar askënd”, u shpreh kapiteni zviceran.Me këtë reagim, Xhaka duket se ka vendosur t’i japë fund polemikave që kanë qarkulluar së fundmi rreth rolit dhe ndikimit të tij brenda kombëtares së Zvicrës.

Jun 19, 2026
Rosie O'Donnell Opens Up: Will She Return to The View Amidst Hasselbeck Drama? New

Rosie O'Donnell Opens Up: Will She Return to The View Amidst Hasselbeck Drama?

Rosie O’Donnell is not closing the door entirely on a return to The View. During an appearance on Watch What Happens Live With Andy Cohen on Thursday, June 18, O’Donnell, 64, was quizzed about whether she’d be interested in returning as a guest host, like her former View sparring partner Elisabeth Hasselbeck did earlier this year. “I would be up to guest host, but they haven’t asked me. So we’ll see what happens,” the comedian and former talk show host shared. O’Donnell also reignited her feud with former costar Hasselbeck, 49, noting that she caught the latter’s return to the ABC daytime talk show in March. “It’s interesting, in the time of Trump, I think she’s the perfect person they want on TV spouting their rhetoric, you know?” O’Donnell said, referring to Hasselbeck’s conservative political views. O’Donnell appeared on The View from 2006 to 2007 (and again from 2014 to 2015) and famously clashed with Hasselbeck on current affairs topics discussed around the table. In May 2007, during a heated debate about the Iraq war, producers used a split-screen shot to show both O’Donnell and Hasselbeck — something that O’Donnell is still unhappy about. “Are you still annoyed that the director went to the split screen?” host Andy Cohen asked O’Donnell. She responded, “Yeah, I’m still annoyed, believe me. Mommy knows how to hold a grudge.” In an October 2025 radio interview, O’Donnell claimed the split-screen saga “was a set-up,” adding, “Our producer [was] not an on-the-fly kind of guy … he wouldn’t have been like, ‘Let’s go to a splitscreen.’ That was prepared.” O’Donnell quickly left The View after the controversial segment, asking to be released from her contract with ABC. “When I went off the stage that day, I went to my dressing room to pack all my stuff up, go back and do the rest of the segments … and walked out and never went back,” O’Donnell said. “It felt to me like I was on a basketball team of five women, and one of them kept tripping me on my way to the hoop. … This [was] supposed to be my team.” “They were right to have me leave that show,” she added. “It is not the best way for me to serve the talent and the people, because arguing about ridiculous, made-up things is a way for a slow death.” O’Donnell returned to The View for a five-month stint in 2014, before departing again in early 2015, citing medical reasons. “[My health] got a little bit worse right before the holidays — [my doctor] was kind of concerned,” she said at the time. “I can't really fix [my personal life] right away, but I can fix [my job]. So I spoke to them at ABC, and I told them, and they understood. They've been unbelievably supportive and loving.”

Jun 19, 2026
Geena Davis Stunned by Netflix's Sudden Move: What Led to 'The Boroughs' Axing? New

Geena Davis Stunned by Netflix's Sudden Move: What Led to 'The Boroughs' Axing?

It was a strange thing. Geena Davis made a comeback for the Netflix show “The Boroughs,” produced by “Stranger Things” creators The Duffer Brothers – and after the streamer canceled the show this week, the actress was left “terribly disappointed.”The “Thelma & Louise” star told The Hollywood Reporter that they weren’t given a reason why Netflix pulled the plug.“Honestly, I don’t know what happened,” Davis said on Thursday. Geena Davis (pictured in “The Boroughs”) said she doesn’t know “what happened” to cancel the show. COURTESY OF NETFLIXDavis, pictured at “The Boroughs” premiere with cast members and producers, in LA on May 18, 2026. Getty ImagesShe noted that the show was in the top 10 most popular current shows on Netflix, and “it’s probably rare” for a show to “not get picked up, and to have it announced that it’s not being picked up while it’s still in the top 10.”  The “A League of Their Own” star said that the cast “didn’t expect” the show to get axed. The creators told them that they were advised to end Season 1 with a cliffhanger, but they opted not to. “There’s a tiny hint at the end that maybe everything isn’t fixed, but it is a complete story,” she explained. “And if we had made it as a limited series, then it would’ve been a big hit and everybody would be happy.”The Duffer Brothers of “Stranger Things” fame (pictured on June 1, 2026) produced the show. Getty Images for The Gotham Film & Media Institute“The Boroughs” also starred Clarke Peters, Alfre Woodard, Alfred Molina, and Davis (pictured) and was billed as “Stranger Things” for older people. COURTESY OF NETFLIXDavis starred in the show – which was billed as “Stranger Things” for older people – along with Alfred Molina, Alfre Woodard, Denis O’Hare, and Bill Pullman. It was a zany supernatural adventure set in a retirement community. “The Boroughs” premiered on May 21 and was canceled less than one month later on June 17.Per Deadline, it drew nearly 10 million viewers in its first week, but sank to below 4 million its second week, signifying that it didn’t seemingly have potential for “long tail growth.” Davis (pictured in “The Boroughs”) hadn’t been onscreen in several years until this role. COURTESY OF NETFLIXDavis (pictured with Carlos Miranda in “The Boroughs”) said she wasn’t worried about how her onscreen romance with a younger man would be viewed. COURTESY OF NETFLIXThe “Beetlejuice” actress was an iconic ‘80s and ‘90s star, but her career slowed down in recent years. She last appeared in episodes of Netflix’s “GLOW” in 2019, making “The Boroughs” somewhat of a comeback.Davis told The Hollywood Reporter, “Nothing interesting had come along. I just go by what’s good.” In the meantime, she said, “I’ve got lots of irons in the fire,” including a movie with Arnold Schwarzenegger. “I feel good.”Davis (pictured at the 2026 Cannes Film Festival on May 23) said “I feel good” about what she has coming up. FilmMagicDavis (pictured in an Instagram snap with Denis O’Hare) said she has “a lot of irons in the fire.” ohdenis/InstagramHer character, Renee, has a romance with a younger man, Paz (Carlos Miranda, 41). She described Renee as a “badass” and said she “didn’t worry” about how the relationship would be received. Davis remarked that she hasn’t heard “anything” about spinoff shows for “The Boroughs,” but the cast “fell so in love with each other.”“[We] just wanted to keep working together,” she added. “Like an anthology series.”According to Variety, the writers had planned to do a three season arc. 

Jun 19, 2026
Shocking Denial: Did Iran Really Get Billions from UAE? New

Shocking Denial: Did Iran Really Get Billions from UAE?

Senior US officials have denied a report that the US, the United Arab Emirates — or any other country — has freed billions of dollars in frozen Iranian assets in exchange for Tehran halting all attacks on the UAE.Reuters last week claimed two unnamed regional sources told them the UAE had agreed to hand over $10 billion — with more than $3 billion of that having been already sent — as part of a cease-fire side deal.The UAE’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has since denied the report, as have senior US officials including Vice President JD Vance — insisting Iran would not be receiving any of the dough until it takes “meaningful steps” to denuclearize.President Trump meets with UAE President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed al-Nahyan during the G7 summit on Tuesday. AFP via Getty ImagesTrump attends a meeting with UAE’s President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed al-Nahyan during the G7 summit on June 16, 2026. AFP via Getty Images“It is interesting just reporting on this, and I really don’t know where it’s coming from, but we suspect that there are some elements within the Iranian hardline system who are trying to signal to their allies or maybe their domestic audience” because they oppose the tentative US-Iran peace proposal, a senior US official said.“The very simple fact is $0 of unfrozen assets have been released by the United States or any other country,” the source said — adding it was “preposterous” to suggest the UAE made a “side deal” with Iran without the US knowing.“Most of the sanctions and most of the international regulations that tie back to [unfreezing] assets — only the United States has control and influence over,” the official said.Reuters had cited two additional “sources with knowledge of the arrangement” who claimed that the underhanded deal involved at least $20 billion, “adding that the move had been agreed in return for a halt to Iranian attacks on ⁠the UAE.”Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian holds up the signed memorandum of understanding between his country and the US. Iranian Presidency/UPI/ShutterstockWorld leaders gather at the G7 summit. REUTERSThe UAE’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in its denial that “these allegations are entirely false and unfounded” and stressed that “no frozen Iranian funds have been released, transferred, or facilitated through the UAE.”The senior US source insisted that the Gulf states “love” the tentative peace proposal, and “because of that, you’re not going to see Qatar or UAE or any of these other countries cut side deals without the Iranians.“We’re their friends. We’ve been in very close coordination, not just during this operation, but for a very long time,” the source said. “So, the idea that any of these countries would cut side deals with the Iranians is not just unlikely but preposterous.”Vessels in the Strait of Hormuz on May 21, 2026. AFP via Getty ImagesThe rumors of asset-unfreezing later spread to include Qatar, with the Financial Times reporting Thursday that the US would allow Qatar to release $6 billion in frozen Iranian assets for Tehran to buy “humanitarian and non-sanctioned goods from the US” after the signing of the US-Iran memorandum of understanding.But Vance denied that report from the White House podium Thursday, telling reporters that “a lot of this reporting is just fundamentally wrong.”Iranian women mourn a baby killed in the Battle of Karbala. Anadolu via Getty ImagesA protester holds an Iranian flag at Iran’s training session ahead of their World Cup match. IMAGN IMAGES via Reuters Connect“I’ve seen some reports — I don’t know where this came from — that the Qataris have released billions of dollars in Iranian assets. That’s just not true,” he said. “It would be impossible for the Qataris to do that without our buy-in, and certainly without us seeing it.“They don’t get one dollar of unfrozen assets — their money, not our money — but they don’t get one dollar of unfrozen assets until they actually perform under the deal,” he said.

Jun 19, 2026
Emotional Fallout: Dayton Bramhall's DCC Dream Shattered by Heartbreaking Cut New

Emotional Fallout: Dayton Bramhall's DCC Dream Shattered by Heartbreaking Cut

America’s Sweethearts: Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders star Dayton Bramhall is proud of her audition — even if she didn’t make the squad. “At least I can say I gave it my all ⭐️��,” Dayton, 28, wrote via Instagram on Wednesday, June 17, sharing a photo from her solo audition featured in the Netflix docuseries. Dayton, whose mom Shelly Bramhall is an associate choreographer for the team after a previous stint as a dancer in the 1980s, has tried out for the DCC multiple times. Most recently, Dayton tried out for the 2025-2026 team last year, as seen on season 3 of America’s Sweethearts. Dayton, however, failed to make it to training camp in the newest batch of episodes. “I’m not OK. She did everything they asked her to do,” Shelly, 57, tearfully said in a confessional during season 3, which is currently streaming on Netflix. “You take strangers that you don’t know and you can’t even give someone you held in the hospital a chance.” The DCC roster is selected by director Kelli Finglass, choreographer Judy Trammel and a rotating panel of judges, including Cowboys executive Charlotte Jones. Kelli, 61, and Judy, 68, were each vocal about the “complicated” decision to cut Dayton considering their longstanding friendship with Shelly. “The judges were consistent. I can sleep at night because I know we gave her every opportunity and she did herself, too. She’s worked hard,” Kelli stated at the time. “It’s just sad that it didn’t work out. Dayton is a beautiful girl and she’s a beautiful dancer. The power and the ability to captivate and excite and ignite the space in which she’s dancing, I don’t think that’s her style of dance.” As for Judy, she merely didn’t want to cut Dayton during training camp. “I would not have wanted Dayton to have had to go through another training camp and be cut again,” Judy noted on the show. “Letting her go at finals was probably the best thing for her. She’s just stressed over this so much and I hate that for her that we couldn’t make her dream come true. We couldn’t help her fulfill it.” Dayton previously made it to the training camp phase of auditions during season 2 of America’s Sweethearts. “She tried hard and it was a competitive year and she wasn’t in the top 36, so we had to make that decision. It’s not easy to share that message,” Kelli exclusively told Us Weekly in June 2025. “She made it to training camp and we would only hope for the best for her. Training camp is where she started getting a little overwhelmed, but she made it to training camp fair and square on her own. So I’m proud of her for that.” The DCC is currently in training camp to select its 2026-2027 squad, though it’s not known whether Dayton tried out again. America’s Sweethearts: Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders is now streaming on Netflix.

Jun 19, 2026
Anne Hathaway's Heartfelt Revelation: The Struggle Before the Joy New

Anne Hathaway's Heartfelt Revelation: The Struggle Before the Joy

Anne Hathaway reflected on her “painful” fertility struggles years before revealing that she is pregnant with baby No. 3.“I think that we have a very one-size-fits-all approach to getting pregnant,” Hathaway told the Associated Press in 2019 after revealing that she struggled with fertility issues before getting pregnant with her and husband Adam Shulman’s second child. “And you get pregnant and for the majority of cases, this is a really happy time. But a lot of people who are trying to get pregnant: That’s not really the story. Or that’s one part of the story,” she continued. “And the steps that lead up to that part of the story are really painful and very isolating and full of self-doubt. And I went through that.”Anne Hathaway (seen here in 2019) previously spoke about her fertility struggles ahead of her pregnancy with baby No. 3. Getty ImagesThe actress was seen with a growing baby bump while on vacation in St. Tropez Wednesday (seen above). BACKGRIDHathaway, now 43, noted that she “didn’t just wave a magic wand” to get pregnant.“It’s more complicated than that,” she said. The actress explained that women often feel like they can’t talk about their fertility issues, even though so many people experience them.“I was just aware of the fact that when it came time to post that I was pregnant, somebody was going to feel even more isolated because of it,” Hathaway said of her pregnancy announcement at the time, in which she sent “extra love” to those who are or have struggled to get pregnant. The “Devil Wears Prada” star confirmed her pregnancy in an Instagram video Friday (seen above). annehathaway/InstagramShe captioned the clip (seen above), “Baby, I’m yours.” annehathaway/Instagram“And I just wanted them to know they have a sister in me,” she said. The “Princess Diaries” star confirmed that she is pregnant by posting a video of her growing baby bump on her Instagram Friday.“x Baby, I’m yours x,” she captioned the post.Page Six also obtained photos of Hathaway covering her growing baby bump with a towel while enjoying a beach day in St. Tropez Wednesday.Hathaway is married to Adam Shulman (seen above). BFA.com / BACKGRIDThe couple (seen here in 2016) already has two sons. GC ImagesHathaway was enjoying some sun at the Jardin Tropezina beach in the French Riviera with her husband, their two sons and a few friends.The Academy Award winner and Schulman got married in 2012 and welcomed their first son, 10-year-old Jonathan, four years later. In 2016, they welcomed their second son, 6-year-old Jack. Years later, Hathaway revealed that she had experienced a miscarriage in 2015.

Jun 19, 2026
M&M's Shocking Color Shake-Up: Which Two Classics Are Vanishing? New

M&M's Shocking Color Shake-Up: Which Two Classics Are Vanishing?

M&M’s are entering their Make America Healthy Again era. But as a result, two historic colors may end up in the can.As the iconic candy marks its 85th year this summer and in a broader effort to remove artificial dyes, M&M’s will debut a natural-ingredient version. And while the brand can figure out how to make red, orange, and yellow M&M’s without artificial dyes, blue and brown are on the chopping block and will not be included in this new iteration. Two of the candy’s signature colors will be missing from an all-natural launch. Jill Greer – stock.adobe.comAs pressure mounts from Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s MAHA movement to ditch synthetic food colorings, candy giant Mars is spending millions of dollars to reinvent one of America’s most recognizable treats. But replacing the bright blue shell that has been part of M&M’s rainbow since 1995 has turned into a surprisingly sticky problem.The culprit is spirulina, the high-protein ingredient often touted as a superfood, which is apparently gumming up the machines at the Mars facility that produces 600 million M&M’s every day.According to a Wall Street Journal report, Mars selected spirulina as the best natural substitute for the artificial dye Blue 1. But the algae-based ingredient requires roughly seven times as much pigment to achieve that M&M “cerulean” hue and ends up creating a thick, foamy mixture that leaves an unwanted plaque, much like what you try to avoid after eating candy.The iconic blue color cannot properly be replicated using natural ingredients. Cristina Ionescu – stock.adobe.comThe coated remnants are said to cause a buildup in pipes and, eventually, mold, which poses a food-safety hazard.“It’s the hardest thing I’ve had to do in my career,” Claire Hewitt, the Mars executive overseeing the multimillion-dollar initiative and self-described “chief color officer,” told the Journal.The blue problem has become so complicated that Mars will debut naturally colored M&M’s in August without two of its classic shades, because brown relies heavily on blue coloring to achieve the look.The company experimented with other options, including purple and pink candies, but executives ultimately decided neither looked right. Mars even considered releasing a three-color mix before settling on a four-color lineup.With MAHA pressures mounting, Mars attempts an alternative version that will be available on Amazon. Getty ImagesMore than 100 employees have worked on the project across Mars facilities, experimenting with just how to crack the coloring code. But the task would come with an expensive overhaul. To combat the gunk, Mars must upgrade more than 300 machines across its M&M’s plants to handle spirulina, which would include installing new mixing tanks, paddles, and motors, Hewitt told the Journal.And cleaning the new cleaning equipment would require hotter water, more force, and more time.  The costly makeover comes as the MAHA movement pushes food manufacturers to phase out synthetic dyes, which Kennedy has linked to various health concerns, particularly in children. Food companies have largely defended the additives as safe and approved by regulators, but growing pressure and restrictions have caused many brands to explore natural alternatives.While Mars actually pledged in 2016 to remove artificial colors from its food products, it then walked back those plans for candy, saying at the time, shoppers weren’t particularly concerned about the dyes in occasional treats.Now the company appears committed to offering consumers another option. Naturally colored M&M’s will initially be sold exclusively through Amazon, while the traditional artificially colored version isn’t going anywhere for now.The ultimate goal is to recreate all six classic M&M colors using natural ingredients by 2028.

Jun 19, 2026
King Charles' Unexpected Gesture Leaves Everyone Wondering New

King Charles' Unexpected Gesture Leaves Everyone Wondering

King Charles III reportedly extended an olive branch to Prince Harry and Meghan Markle after years of estrangement and strain.The monarch, 77, has invited his son and daughter-in-law to stay at a royal residence when they make their return to the UK next month, according to the Sun.The outlet further claimed that Charles also offered the Sussexes — who will bring their children, Prince Archie, 7, and Princess Lilibet, 5, with them — security arrangements following Harry’s battle for taxpayer-funded protection.King Charles (seen here in May) extended an olive branch to his son Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. Getty ImagesCharles has offered the couple (seen here in 2022) to stay at a royal residence when they visit the UK with their two children. POOL/AFP via Getty ImagesThe Duke and Duchess of Sussex were stripped of their security privileges after stepping down from their royal duties and moving to the US in 2020, leading to ongoing tension with his family.Harry, 41, previously stated that he did not “feel safe” in the UK because his family had allegedly “been subjected to well-documented neo-Nazi and extremist threats.” Markle, notably, is biracial.“Megxit,” as it came to be called, left a bad taste in the royal family’s mouths, as did the couple’s infamous interview with Oprah Winfrey in 2021, followed by the prince’s 2023 tell-all book, “Spare.”He also offered to give Markle and Harry (seen here in April) security. Getty ImagesCharles has been estranged from his youngest son and his family after he left his royal duties in 2021. Samir Hussein/WireImageHowever, after Harry met with his dad in his London home for “private tea” last September, the duke admitted he wanted to spend more time in his native England and bring his wife and kids with him.The foursome will travel from California across the pond in the second week of July for a series of events ahead of the annual Invictus Games.The reported “new conditions” ahead of the visit mean that “a safe return” can take place.Harry and Markle are set to bring their two children to the UK in July. meghan/InstagramHarry and Markle have also fallen out with Prince William and Kate Middleton (all four seen here in September 2022). Getty Images“There is a hope they will both be able to find time in their schedules to catch up when Harry is in the UK,” a source told the Sun, claiming that the father-son duo “speak regularly.”Archie and Lili have not been to the UK since June 2022, while Markle’s last visit was three months later for Queen Elizabeth II’s funeral.It’s unclear whether the former actress, 44, and her father-in-law will interact during the upcoming trip.Reps for both Charles and the Sussexes did not immediately respond to Page Six’s requests for comment.

Jun 19, 2026
Shock Exit: Who Won't Return to 'Summer House' After Explosive Drama? New

Shock Exit: Who Won't Return to 'Summer House' After Explosive Drama?

Fans are on their toes waiting to see who will — and won’t — return for Summer House season 11. Season 10 was filled with drama as Kyle Cooke and Amanda Batula navigated their relationship woes. After deciding to call it quits after four years of marriage, Amanda quickly moved on with costar West Wilson — who also happens to be the ex of Amanda’s best friend Ciara Miller. Amanda and West confirmed their romance after filming concluded, but the topic was the center of discussion at the reunion and a bonus episode titled “The Aftermath.” The show is expected to follow the fallout from Amanda and West’s relationship in season 11, but will be doing so without one key figure. A source exclusively told Us Weekly in June 2026 that West would not be returning amid the scandal. Keep scrolling to see who is and isn’t returning for Summer House season 11: Lindsay Hubbard Lindsay, who has been on Summer House since its 2017 premiere, is an original main cast member and expected to return for season 11. Carl Radke As the second Summer House OG, Carl is likely to return next season. Kyle Cooke Kyle raised eyebrows in June 2026 when fans thought he was saying goodbye to the Bravo series on social media. However, Kyle quickly clarified that wasn’t the case. “The show isn’t cancelled and this is not me announcing I won’t return,” he wrote via Instagram. “I was feeling emo and always planned [on] sharing the cover photo because it DID feel like the end of an era, which is why everyone else was so emotional saying their goodbyes on the finale.” Amanda Batula Last season, Amanda was front and center with her and Kyle’s relationship issues and breakup before she made headlines for her new controversial romance with West. Season 11 is expected to pick up on the aftermath of Amanda and West’s scandal. However, it is unclear if Amanda will be back. Ciara Miller Ciara was a main fixture in Amanda and West’s romance scandal as Ciara — who is besties with Amanda — dated West on-and-off before ultimately making things official with Amanda. Ciara’s costars — and fans — have rallied around her amid the betrayal. While many expect Ciara to return, she has not officially confirmed her involvement in season 11. Ciara does have other projects in the works, including hosting Love Island USA’s After Sun program. Jesse Solomon While the season 11 cast has not been officially announced, a source exclusively told Us in June 2026 that Jesse will return. West Wilson Following fallout from the season 10 reunion due to his romance with Amanda, a source exclusively told Us in June 2026 that West was not asked back for Summer House. “West isn’t coming back,” the insider explained. “He could still make an appearance on Summer House or In the City in the future, especially if things with Amanda progress, but he’s not a cast member this season.” An additional insider told Us the decision was “mutual.” “It became even clearer that there wasn’t a long-term fit anymore,” the source shared. “He is at peace with the decision and is focusing on his podcast and other business ventures.” Mia Calabrese It has not been confirmed if Mia, who joined the cast in season 10, will make a return. KJ Dillard While KJ made his Summer House debut in season 10, he has made headlines for calling out friend West amid the scandal. His return for season 11 has yet to be confirmed. Dara Levitan Dara, who previously dated West and KJ, also joined the series in season 10. Her fate for season 11 is still up in the air. Levi Sebree A source told Us in June 2026 that newcomer Levi was not asked back for season 11. Bailey Taylor There has been no confirmation whether Bailey, who was a season 10 newbie, will return. Ben Waddell Ben’s involvement in Summer House season 11 is uncertain, according to an insider.

Jun 19, 2026
Ken Griffin's Bold Call: Why NYC Business Leaders Must Stand Up Now New

Ken Griffin's Bold Call: Why NYC Business Leaders Must Stand Up Now

Ken Griffin is taking a fresh shot at New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani — while voicing willingness to speak with the far-left leader down the road.The Citadel founder on Thursday urged New York’s business leaders to “fight for their city” as he renewed his criticism of the democratic socialist mayor whose “tax the rich” campaign turned Griffin into a political target earlier this year.“They need to find their voice and fight for their city,” Griffin said at an Upper East Side groundbreaking, according to Bloomberg News.Citadel founder Ken Griffin says New York business leaders should “fight for their city” as his feud with Mayor Zohran Mamdani enters a new phase. AFP via Getty Images“My advice is to speak up. What’s the worst that’s going to happen?”The billionaire hedge fund manager, whose firm employs thousands of workers in New York, said his firm will outlast Mamdani’s administration.“Everything should be viewed through the lens of, Citadel will be here far longer than he’ll be mayor,” he said.While Griffin has been ghosting Mamdani’s outreach, he said Thursday they’ll speak — eventually.“I plan to talk to him at some point in the months ahead,” he said.“Let’s see where he is on the state of policy at that time. Actions speak louder than words.”The comments came during a groundbreaking ceremony for the Kenneth C. Griffin Pavilion, a new 27-story inpatient facility being built by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Griffin and fellow billionaire David Geffen committed $400 million to the project.Despite his increasingly visible investments in Florida — recently expanding plans for a sprawling Miami development — Griffin indicated Thursday that New York remains central to Citadel’s future.Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s “tax the rich” agenda sparked a high-profile clash with one of Wall Street’s most powerful hedge fund managers. Erik Pendzich/ShutterstockAt the same time, he warned that business leaders cannot afford to remain silent.“It will be that New York empties of talent and that’s a catastrophe,” he said, outlining a nightmare scenario for the city under Mamdani.“If the mayor wants to say a few words about you, your record speaks for itself: You create jobs, you create value and you pay taxes.”Earlier this year, Mamdani ignited the public feud by filming a viral Tax Day video outside Griffin’s $238 million penthouse at 220 Central Park South to promote a new pied-à-terre tax on wealthy owners of second homes.Griffin’s $238 million penthouse at 220 Central Park South became ground zero in the fight over New York’s new pied-à-terre tax. Christopher Sadowski for NY PostMamdani turned Griffin into the face of his campaign to tax wealthy owners of luxury second homes. Mayor Mamdani/XStanding outside the residence on Billionaires’ Row, Mamdani called out Griffin by name while touting his promise to “tax the rich” and celebrating the levy aimed at luxury properties owned by nonresidents.The video drew howls from the business community and angered Griffin. He described the stunt as “creepy” and accused the mayor of turning a policy disagreement into a personal attack.Griffin is expected to owe an additional $1.3 million to $1.4 million in taxes next year due to the pied-à-terre tax, according to calculations by Business Insider.His largesse appears to continue unabated. The Upper East Side cancer center joins a growing list of New York institutions that have received major donations from Griffin, including the Hospital for Special Surgery and the American Museum of Natural History.The Post has sought comment from Griffin and Mamdani.

Jun 19, 2026